Interactive review

AI agent governance drill

Would you allow this AI agent to export customer data?

The question is not whether the agent can do it. The question is whether the owner, limits, approval, and retained record are strong enough to defend the decision afterward.

Governance view Finance agent request
Identity Owner assigned
Scope Export tool allowed
Policy Approval link missing
Evidence Audit trail not sealed
AI agent decision review Risk: High

Finance agent requests a customer export

The export contains 12,400 customer records and would leave the review workspace. The agent has an owner, but its approval path and evidence chain are incomplete.

Request Customer export

External review package

Agent Finance agent

Owner assigned, role recently changed

Approval Manager approved

Approval exists, policy link missing

Agent identity

Owner assigned

Tool scope

Limit unclear

Approval policy

Not tied to policy version

Audit trail

Logged, not sealed

Why this matters

AI use is growing faster than many teams can document it.

AgentBoundary is being shaped around this gap: agent identity, ownership, tool limits, approval rules, review history, evidence, and stop controls.

Before rollout Know which agents exist, who owns them, and what tools they can reach.
During action Route high-risk requests through policy checks and human approval.
Afterward Keep an evidence trail that shows what happened and why the decision was allowed.

Private pilot

Have an AI workflow your team needs to explain and control?

Kairnex is working with a small number of teams willing to test a real governance workflow and give direct feedback on what must be clearer.

Good pilot fit

AI agent access, customer data exports, approval workflows, evidence handoff, vendor review, or audit-readiness workflows where the record needs to be clearer.